Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika contains research results of physics learning, both in school and in Higher Education

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Makalah yang diajukan untuk dimuat dalam Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika harus berupa hasil penelitian yang belum pernah dipublikasi dan tidak dalam proses untuk publikasi atau seminar. Demikian pula setelah makalah dimuat di Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika tidak dibenarkan diterbitkan kembali dalam bahasa Indonesia maupun bahasa lain, kecuali dengan izin resmi dari redaksi Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika.

Diterima atau tidaknya suatu makalah merupakan keputusan redaksi yang tidak dapat diganggu gugat. Penulis akan menerima hasil evaluasi redaksi dalam waktu tidak lebih dari enam minggu.

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Author Guidelines

Carefully read the submission guidelines as follows:

A. General Requirements

The minimum standard requirements of the Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika must be:

  1. Written in Bahasa.
  2. The article must include abstract in Bahasa and English (100-250 words) and be following by the keywords (3-5 words).
  3. Use of a tool such as Zotero, Mendeley, or EndNote for reference management and formatting. The citation must be in the form of in-text and bibliography are based on Vancouver numerical system
  4. Make sure that your paper is prepared using the JP2F paper template.

B. Structure of The Manuscript

The manuscript must be prepared and suggested present follow the structure:

  1. Title. The title of the paper should describe research aims, method/model, and objective, without Acronym or abbreviation.
  2. Abstract. The Abstract has 100 to 250 WORDSNo citation; State in the abstract a primary objectiveresearch designmethodologymain outcomes, and results, and the conclusions.
  3. Section structure. Authors are suggested to present their articles in the section structure: Pendahuluan Metode - Hasil dan Pembahasan – Simpulan - Ucapan Terima Kasih  - Daftar Pustaka
  4. Pendahuluan. It is a mandatory to explain the objectives of the work, as well as an adequate background, a literature review, a summary of the results.
  5. Metode. It is a mandatory to explain sufficient detail to allow the work to be reproduced.
  6. Hasil dan Pembahasan.  The results of the research are presented in the form of graphs, tables, or descriptive. Analysis and interpretation of these results are needed before they are discussed. The discussion is focused on linking the data and the results of its analysis to the problems or objectives of the study and the broader theoretical context. 
  7. Simpulan. Conclusions summarise key results and may include any plans for relevant future work.
  8. Ucapan Terima Kasih. The author can write thanks to those who have provided assistance or support from colleagues, superiors, or certain agencies.
  9. Daftar Pustaka. References list relevant papers referred to in the other sections, citing original works, both historical and recent. The referenced literature is suggested to contain more than 80% of primary reference in the last 10 years. Primary references include articles in scientific journals, proceedings, dissertations, theses, monographs, books and others which are the result of direct research.
Please contact info jp2f@upgris.ac.id for the problems.

 

Author Fees

This journal imposes the following author fees.

Publication Articles: 300.000.00 (IDR) If this paper is accepted for publication, you will be asked to pay an Article Publication Fee to cover publication costs. We maintain the quality of our articles so that additional costs will be borne by the authors for our publication services.

 

Screening for Plagiarism

The manuscript that submitted into this journal will be screened for plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/

 

Digital Archiving

This journal utilizes the Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD), and Garuda (Garba Rujukan Digital) system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration.

 

Creative Commons license

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Publication Ethics

JP2F publication ethics refers to the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) on Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Publication ethics documents for authors and editors can be seen at the following link.

International standards for authors

International standards for editors

The duties of the author, editors, and reviewers are described as bellows.

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards: 
    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
  2. Data Access and Retention: 

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  1. Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.
  2. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: 
    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.
  3. Acknowledgement of Sources: 
    Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.
  4. Authorship of the Paper: 
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.
  6. Fundamental errors in published works: 
    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.
  7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: 
    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play: 
    An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.
  2. Confidentiality: 
    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.
  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.
  4. Publication Decisions: 
    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.
  5. Review of Manuscripts: 
    The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.
  2. Promptness: 
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process
  3. Standards of Objectivity: 
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.
  4. Confidentiality: 
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.
  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.
  6. Acknowledgement of Sources: 
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.