The impact of peer-feedback on students’ writing skills

Sinarwiyati Maimunah

Abstract


People nowadays are getting addicted to using the internet, especially blogs. Then this phenomenon inspires English lecturers to use blogs as a medium to teach writing in an EFL class. This research, therefore, discusses the students' experience of writing using blogs. Here, the blog is used by the students to post their writing assignments based on lessons and discussions in the classroom as well as provide and receive feedback. It is integrated into the English Department at an Islamic university in Semarang. While carrying out the research, the qualitative research method is employed. Data are mainly gathered through students’ writings posted to their blogs, peer feedback questionnaires, and interviews. The research reveals that 95% of students in the class agree that posting their writings on a blog is an interesting thing to do, and 93% argue that providing and receiving feedback helps them to revise their writing, mainly in the case of grammar and vocabulary. It shows that the experience in writing using blogs and interactions between students can enhance their writing abilities. Moreover, the chance to revise their writing is the developing process that can build their motivation and confidence. In the end, it is hoped that this research might inspire English teachers to implement a blog peer feedback process and design suitable activities in an EFL writing class.

Keywords


Peer feedback; writing skills; blogs

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amores, M. J. (1997). A new perspective on peer-editing. Foreign Language Annals, 30(4), 513-522.

Cahyani, Hilda & Cahyono, Bambang Y. (2012). Teachers’ attitudes and technology use in Indonesian EFL classrooms. TEFLIN Journal, Volume 23, Number 2, July 2012.

Campbell, A. P. (2013). Weblogs for use with ESL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 9(2).

Campbell, A. P. (2014). Using live journals for authentic communication in EFL classes. The Internet TESL Journal, 10(9).

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education (7th ed.). Routledge.

Dieu, B. (2004). Blogs for Language Learning. Essential Teacher. Autumn 1 (4).

Gardner, T. (2015). Ten ways to use digital tools in the writing classroom. Student Success in Writing Conference.

Gedera, Dilani S.P. (2012). Teaching English with Technology, 12(4), 16-30. Pearson Education Limited.

Leki, I. (1990). Potential problems with peer responding in ESL writing classes. CATESOL Journal, 3, 5-19.

Li, M. (2019). Adopting varied feedback modes in the EFL writing class. US-China Foreign Language, 7(1), 60-63.

Lin, G.H., & Chien, PC. (2009). An investigation into the effectiveness of peer feedback. Journal of Applied Foreign Languages Fortune Institute of Technology, 3, 79-87.

Liu, J., & Hansen, J. (2012). Peer response in second language writing classrooms. The University of Michigan Press.

Lundstrom, K., & Baker, W. (2019). To give is better than to receive: the benefits of peer review to the receiver's own writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 18, 30-43.

Morra, A. M., & Romano, M.E. (2019). University students' reactions to guided peer feedback of EAP compositions. Journal of College Literacy & Learning, 35, 19-30.

Paquet, S. (2013). Personal knowledge publishing and its uses in research.

Tanathakul, Thanatkun. (2008). Integrated approaches to improve students' writing skills for English major students. ABAC Journal, Vol. 28, No. 2.

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2016). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15, 179-200.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/lej.v3i1.22031

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Sinarwiyati Maimunah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Linguistics and Education Journal by Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.