COMPARATIVE STUDY OF INDONESIA AND THE NETHERLANDS ON LEGAL PROTECTION FOR SEPARATIST CREDITORS IN BANKRUPTCY WITH THE PRINCIPLE OF CONCURSUS CREDITORUM
Abstract
This study examines the legal protection of secured (separatist) creditors in bankruptcy through a comparative analysis of Indonesian and Dutch legal systems, focusing on the concursus creditorum principle. Secured creditors have preferential rights due to their security interests over debtor assets. Although both countries follow civil law traditions, Indonesia’s implementation under Law No. 37 of 2004 is weakened by limited judicial oversight and the dominant role of curators. In contrast, Dutch law, through the Faillissementswet, allows courts greater authority in supervising secured asset execution, ensuring better balance among creditors.
Using a normative juridical method with statutory, comparative, and conceptual approaches, the research finds that the Dutch system offers stronger collective protection and legal fairness. The study concludes that Indonesia needs legal reforms to adopt collective justice principles and improve the proportional legal protection of secured creditors in bankruptcy processes.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Djaja S. Meliala. (2018). Hukum Kepailitan: Teori dan Praktik. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.
Faber, Dennis & Niels Vermunt. (2014). “The Position of Secured Creditors in Insolvency Proceedings under Dutch Law,” International Insolvency Review, Vol. 23, Issue 3.
Faisal. (2024). “Eksekusi Objek Jaminan Fidusia oleh Kreditor Separatis dalam Kepailitan,” Collegium Studiosum Journal, Vol. 7, No. 2.
Fuady, Munir. (2016). Hukum Pailit dalam Teori dan Praktik. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Hadjon, Philipus M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu.
Ibrahim, Johnny. (2006). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Khairandy, Ridwan. (2011). Hukum Kepailitan: Perlindungan Hukum bagi Kreditor Separatis dan Kreditor Konkuren. Yogyakarta: FH UII Press.
Örücü, Esin. (2006). “Methodology of Comparative Law,” in The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Law, ed. Mathias Reimann & Reinhard Zimmermann. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rahardjo, Satjipto. (2000). Ilmu Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.
Rahayu, Hartini. (2018). “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditor Separatis dalam Kepailitan,” Jurnal Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 47, No. 2.
Sentika, Adilah Dea dan Raden Besse Kartoningrat. (2020). “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis dalam Mengeksekusi Objek Jaminan Saat Terjadi Kepailitan,” Jurnal Perspektif, Vol. 25, No. 1.
Silalahi, Din dan Claudia Claudia. (2020). “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis atas Hak Jaminan dalam Proses Kepailitan,” Masalah-Masalah Hukum, Vol. 49, No. 1.
Sjahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2002). Hukum Kepailitan. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.
Solinge, Gerard van dan Nathalie van der Feltz. (2015). Insolvency Law in the Netherlands. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.
Vriesendorp, Reinout. (2018). “The Balance of Creditors' Interests in Dutch Insolvency Law,” European Company and Financial Law Review, Vol. 15, No. 4.
Wessels, Bob. (2017). International Insolvency Law: Part II. European Insolvency Law (Deventer: Kluwer.
World Bank. (2020). Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank Group. Retrieved from https://www.doingbusiness.org
Yusri, M. (2015). “Kedudukan Kreditor Separatis dalam Hukum Kepailitan Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum IUS, Vol. 3, No. 2.
Zweigert, Konrad dan Hein Kötz. (1998). An Introduction to Comparative Law, terj. Tony Weir. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v8i2.23509
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Meta-Yuridis
Jurnal Meta-Yuridis
Alamat Redaksi: Kantor Jurnal Meta-Yuridis UPGRIS Gedung Pusat Ruang Fakultas Hukum, Jalan Sidodadi Timur No. 24 Dr. Cipto Semarang.
Telp. (024) 8316377; Faks. (024) 8448217.
Pos-email: [email protected] dan metayuridisjurnal@gmail.com.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.