MENGGUNAKAN CONTOH DALAM PEMBUKTIAN

Christina Kartika Sari, Mohamad Waluyo, Citra Maharani Ainur, Eka Nurhayati Darmaningsih

Abstract


Penelitian ini bertujuan mengidentifikasi bukti-bukti yang dihasilkan mahasiswa dalam memecahkan soal-soal Pengantar Analisis Riil, khususnya bukti yang memanfaatkan contoh spesifik. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Subyek diambil dari 54 mahasiswa yang menempuh mata kuliah Pengantar Analisis Riil. Seluruh subjek dihadapkan pada dua soal pembuktian. Dari 54 mahasiswa, tidak lebih dari 15% yang mampu menuliskan bukti yang valid. Sekitar 30% masih belum memiliki pengetahuan yang cukup untuk dapat dirangkai menjadi sebuah bukti yang valid, sehingga mereka gagal dalam membuktikan. Hampir 30% mahasiswa tampak berhasil menyelesaikan pembuktian, tapi ternyata bukti tersebut tidak valid, salah satunya Putri. Putri memilih satu contoh spesifik untuk membuktikan suatu pernyataan implikasi yang general. Contoh yang dipilih Putri pun mengabaikan asumsi-asumsi yang diminta oleh soal. Selain itu, Putri tampak mencampuradukkan definisi dan teorema yang sekiranya terkait dengan soal. Oleh karena itu, pembelajaran Pengantar Analisis Riil hendaknya menekankan pemahaman definisi, teorema, lemma, maupun pernyataan matematika lainnya dengan lebih bermakna.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alcock, Lara dan Adrian Simpson. “Classification and Concept Consistencyâ€. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, (2011) 11:2, 91-106. DOI:10.1080/14926156.2011.570476

Bartle, Robert G dan Donald R. Sherbert. 2010. Introduction to Real Analysis (Fourth Edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Bills, E. dan David Tall. “Operable definitions in advanced mathematics: The case of least upper boundâ€. Proceedings of PME 22 (1998), 2: 104-111. Stellenbosch, South Africa.

Dawson, John W. “Why Do Mathematicians Re-prove Theorems?†Philosophia Mathematica (III) 14 (2006):269–286. DOI:10.1093/philmat/nkl009.

Ellis, Ami B, et al. “Choosing and Using Examples: How Example Activity can Support Proof Insightâ€. Dalam Lindmeier, A. M. & Heinze, A. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International 2 – 265. Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 2 (2013): 265-272. Kiel, Germany: PME.

Hanna, Gila dan Michael de Villiers. “The 19th ICMI Study: Proof and proving in mathematics educationâ€. ZDM Mathematics Education (2008) 40: 329–336. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI 10.1007/s11858-008-0073-4.

Harel, Guershon dan Evan Fuller. “Reid, D.A. and Knipping, C.: Proof in mathematics education: research, learning, and teachingâ€. ZDM Mathematics Education (2013) 45:497–499. DOI 10.1007/s11858-013-0497-3.

Hemmi, Kirsti. “Three styles characterising mathematicians’ pedagogical perspectives on proofâ€. Educ Stud Math (2010) 75:271–291. Springer. DOI 10.1007/s10649-010-9256-3

Ioannou, Marios. “Commognitive Analysis of Undergraduate Mathematics Students’ Responses in Proving Subgroup’s Non-Emptinessâ€. Dalam White, B., Chinnappan, M. & Trenholm, S. (Eds.). Opening up mathematics education research (Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) (2016): 344–351. Adelaide: MERGA.

Ko, Yi-Yin dan Eric Knuth. “Undergraduate mathematics majors’ writing performance producing proofs and counterexamples about continuous functionsâ€. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 28 (2009): 68–77. Elsevier. DOI:10.1016/j.jmathb.2009.04.005.

Lai, Yvonne; Keith Weber and Juan Pablo Mejıa-Ramos. “Mathematicians’ Perspectives on Features of a Good Pedagogical Proofâ€. Cognition and Instruction, 30(2) (2012): 146–169. Taylor & Francis Group, LLC. DOI: 10.1080/07370008.2012.661814.

Lockwood, Elise; Amy B. Ellis, dan Alison G. Lynch. “Mathematicians’ Example-Related Activity when Exploring and Proving Conjecturesâ€. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. (2016) 2:165–196. Springer International Publishing Switzerland. DOI 10.1007/s40753-016-0025-2.

Mairing, Jackson Pasini. “Student’s Difficulties in Solving Problem of Real Analysisâ€. Dalam Proceeding of International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics And Sciences 2014, Yogyakarta State University, 18-20 May 2014.

Mackey, A. dan Gass, S. M. Second Language Research: Methodology and Design Second Edition. New York: Routledge, 2016.

Mills, Melissa. “A framework for example usage in proof presentationsâ€. Journal of Mathematical Behavior 33 (2014) 106–118. Elsevier Inc. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.11.001.

Selden, Annie. “Transitions and Proof and Proving at Tertiary Levelâ€. Dalam Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. Hanna, G. dan Villiers, M. D. New ICMI Study Series Vol. 15. 2012. Springer.

Selden, Annie dan John Selden. “Overcoming students’ difficulties in learning to understand and construct proofsâ€. Technical report of Department of Mathematics, Tennessee Technological University 2007-1.

Selden, Annie dan John Selden. “Proof and Problem Solving at University Levelâ€. The Mathematics Enthusiast: Vol. 10: No. 1 (2013), Article 14.

Stavrou, S. G. “Common Errors and Misconceptions in Mathematical Proving by Education Undergraduatesâ€. IUMPST: The Journal. Vol 1 (Content Knowledge), March 2014.

Stylianou1, Despina A.; Maria L. “Blanton dan Ourania Rotou. Undergraduate Students’ Understanding of Proof: Relationships between Proof Conceptions, Beliefs, and Classroom Experiences with Learning Proofâ€. Int. J. Res. Undergrad. Math. Ed. (2015) 1:91–134. DOI 10.1007/s40753-015-0003-0

Tall, David, et al. “Cognitive Development of Proofâ€. Dalam Proof and Proving in Mathematics Education. Hanna, G. dan Villiers, M. D. 2012. New ICMI Study Series Vol. 15. Springer.

Thompson, Dennise. R.; Sharon L. Senk dan Gwendolyn J. Johnson. “Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooksâ€. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, (2012) Vol. 43, No. 3: 253-295.

Weber, Keith. “Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledgeâ€. Educational Studies in Mathematics. (2001) 48(1):101-11.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v2i1.1475

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


JIPMat (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) Indexed by:

                  

Creative Commons License

JIPMat (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika) is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.