2.png)
Fake News on Social Media A Threat to Social Conditions: Critical Discourse Study
Abstract
The phenomenon of using language in cyberspace or social media is trending with various up-to-date applications with the aim of being more effective and efficient communicating. This research really needs to be done because there is rampant communication that is not wise through social media, in addition, no one has studied this phenomenon from a language perspective. This research focuses on fake news texts in the media social context with a focus on discourse, namely the impact of fake news texts on social conditions. The purpose of this study is to describe in depth the problem of the threat of spreading fake news texts on social media to social conditions. The aim is to find out and analyze threats in the form of the impact of spreading fake news on social media on social conditions. Methods and techniques of data collection by way of observation, documentation of the instrument with a questionnaire. Based on the results of an analysis of the data found related to the spread of fake news texts on social media, it has an impact on social conditions in terms of aspects; (a) Aspects of media literacy, less wise in using social media; (b) The economic aspect, the motivation to live instantly is reflected in unhealthy economic competition; (c) Health aspect, reflected by people with unhealthy lifestyles and obstacles to health stability nationally; (d) Political aspects, the occurrence of dishonest and unfair political implementation in the process of political contestation.
Keywords
References
Allcott, H., & Gentzkow, M. (2017). Social media and fake news in the 2016 Election. Journal Of Economic Perspectives, 31(2), pp.211-236. DOI:10.1257/jep.31.2.211.
Arikunto, S. (2002). Metodologi penelitian suatu pendekatan proposal. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Bassio, D. (2017). Journalism and social media: Practitioners, organizations and institutions. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bell, D. (2001). An introduction to cybercultures. London: Routledge.
Broersma, M. (2013). A refractured paradigm: Journalism, hoax and the challenge of trust. London: Routledge.
Carr, C. T., & Hayes, R. A. (2015). Social Media: Defining, Developing, and Divining. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23(1), 46–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/15456870.2015.972282
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five approaches (4th Ed.). California: Sage Publishing.
David, N. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin Book.
Fairclough, H. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. New York: Longman.
Halliday, M.A.K., & Ruqaiya, H. (1992). Language, context and text: Aspect of language in a social-semiotic perspective. Oxford University Press.
Harley, D. (2008). Common hoaxes and chain letters. San Diego: ESET, LLC.
Istriayani, R., & Widiana, N. H. (2016). Etika komunikasi dalam membendung informasi hoax di ranah politik Maya”Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah, Vol, 36, No 2. https://doi.org/10.21580/jid.v36.2.1774.
Jordan. T. (1999). Cyberpower: The culture and politics of cyberspace and the internet. Washington D.C: Sage.
Jorgensen, M. W., & Phillips, L. J. (2010). Discourse analysis: Theory and method. SAGE Publication Ltd.
Kholid. (2019). Tiga dimensi warna demokrasi Indoensia: Kajian semiotik (Roland Barthes). Jurnal Edukasi Sumba (JES), 3(2), pp.88–91. https://doi.org/10.53395/jes.v3i2.47
Legionosuko, T. Hamowo, S. (2017). Dynamics Fake news or hoax as a source of horizontal conflict in the provincial poverty of DKI Jakarta 2017. Jurnal Damai dan Resolusi Konflik Universitas Pertahanan RI, 3(3) https://jurnalprodi.idu.ac.id/index.php/DRK/article/view/186
Parwati, I., & Sugesti, I. (2023). Exploring EFL students’ strategies in writing research background at one of the universities in Cirebon. Allure Journal, 3(1), 38-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v3i1.13352
Prayitno, B. (2017). Langkah pemerintah menangkal dimensi berita bohong. Jurnal Wacana Kinerja, 20(2), pp.17-40. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.31845/jwk.v20i2.19
Tyas, N. K., & Pratama, F. G. (2022). Conversation analysis: Turn-taking analysis on Boy William podcast episode 06 in collaboration with Cinta Laura. Allure Journal, 2(2), 96-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v2i2.11997
Van, D. T. (2000). Discourse Ideology and Context. London
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v3i2.15703
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 kholid hol lid
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
ALLURE Journal by English Education Study Program, Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.