Assessment Literacy Profile of Science Teachers in SMAN 1 Gubug

Ipah Budi Minarti, Atip Nurwahyunani, Dewi Purichasari

Abstract


Assessment is an integrated part of the planning and implementation process of learning. The transition from KTSP to the 2013 curriculum is a problem for teachers in applying assessment skills in learning, because teachers still have difficulty implementing authentic assessments and still use assessments in terms of cognitive tests only (Setiadi, 2016). This study aims to determine the literacy profile of science teacher assessments at SMA Negeri 1 Gubug and the assessment used by science teachers. This is because there is no source of research on teacher awareness of assessment in SMA Negeri 1 Gubug. This research uses descriptive quantitative research method, with purposive sampling. The instruments used in this research are the assessment literacy test, interview guidelines, questionnaires, and check list sheets. Based on the results of data analysis and discussion, it can be concluded that the assessment literacy profile of science teachers at SMA Negeri 1 Gubug is based on PAP Type II is in the "Very Low" category (assessment literacy questionnaire) and "Low" category (interview results). The teacher has the highest score with a score of 86% on the aspect of the difficulty of using the assessment, while the lowest score is on the aspect of attitude assessment by getting a score of 18%. The implication of this study is that by knowing the literacy assessment profile, teachers can understand and implement the importance of assessment so that this can be used as a benchmark in improving the quality of learning.

Keywords


assessment literacy; teachers' profile; science teachers

Full Text:

PDF

References


American Association for the advancent ofsScience (AAAS). (1993). Benchmarks for Science Literacy : A Project 2016 Repot. oxford University Press.

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-dasar evaluasi pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Custer, R. L., Schell, J., McAlister, B. D., Scott, J. L., & Hoepfl, M. (2000). Using authentic assessment in vocational education. Information Series No. 381 (p. 86).

Fatonah, S. (2016). Evaluasi pelaksanaan asesmen otentik kurikulum 2013 di mi yogyakarta. AL-BIDAYAH: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 8(2), 113–128.

Juandi, A. (2016). Standar penilaian pendidikan. https://doi.org/10.31227/osf.io/munp2

Khadijeh, B., & Amir, R. (2015). Importance of teachers’ assessment literacy. International Journal of English Language Education, 3(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6887

Leipziger, D. (2004). The OECD principles of corporate governance. The Corporate Responsibility Code Book: Third Edition, 216, 347–416. https://doi.org/10.9774/gleaf.9781783530670_21

Lissitz, R. W., & Samuelsen, K. (2007). A suggested change in terminology and emphasis regarding validity and education. Educational Researcher, 36(8), 437–448.

Masidjo, D. I. (1995). Penilaian Pencapaian Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah. Kanisius.

Mendikbud. (2013). Permendikbud No. 65 Tahun 2013 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 2011, 1–18.

Menteri Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan RI. (2013). Permendikbud No 66 Tahun 2013 tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. 2011, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.metabol.2009.10.012

Mukhtar. (2007). Bimbingan Skripsi Tesis dan Artikel Ilmiah. Gaung Persada Press.

Rumiati, S. W. (2011). Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP : Belajar dari PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: Pusat Pengembangan Dan Pemberdayaan Pendidik Dan Tenaga Kependidikan (PPPPTK) Matematika, 55.

Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173

Stiggins, B. R. J., & Stiggins, R. (2002). Assessment crisis: The absence of assessment for learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(10), 1–10. https://engageny.org/sites/default/files/resource/attachments/assessmentcrisis.pdf%5Cnhttp://www.edtechpolicy.org/CourseInfo/edhd485/AssessmentCrisis.pdf

Uno, H. B. dan S. K. (2012). Assessment Pembelajaran. Bumi Aksara.

Wulan, A. R. (2007). Pengertian Dan Esensi Konsep. Jurnal FPMIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, 1–12. https://s3.amazonaws.com/academia.edu.documents/34534033/pengertian_asesmen.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIAIWOWYYGZ2Y53UL3A&Expires=1506371598&Signature=owWzr%2FX4u4L9qbWm0yLXpyEQrsk%3D&response-content-disposition=inline%3B filename%3DPENGERTIAN_DAN_ESENSI_KONSE

Wulan, A. R. (2010). Kemampuan Calon Guru Biologi Dalam Menyusun Rubrik Analitis Pada Asesmen Kinerja. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Sains, XIV(1), 45–48.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/ijre.v3i1.13558

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Ipah Budi Minarti, Atip Nurwahyunani, Dewi Purichasari

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Web Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter View My Stats

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Research in Education (IJRE)
 by LPPM Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.