Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika memiliki fokus utama pada pengembangan ilmu di ranah matematika dan pendidikan. Lingkup dari fokus utama tersebut meliputi pendidikan dan terapan.


Section Policies


Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

Setiap artikel yang masuk ke redaksi akan dipilih melalui proses review awal oleh Dewan Editor. Kemudian, artikel akan dikirim ke mitra bebestari/peer reviewer dan akan menuju ke seleksi berikutnya dengan proses review. Setiap artikel akan direview oleh minimum 2 (dua) orang mitra bebestari/peer reviewer. Setelah itu, artikel akan dikembalikan ke penulis untuk direvisi. Proses ini membutuhkan waktu maksimum satu bulan. Dalam setiap naskah, mitra bebestari/peer reviewer akan menilai aspek substansial dan teknis. Mitra bebestari/peer reviewer yang bekerja sama dengan Imajiner adalah ahli di bidang matematika dan pendidikan matematika. Mereka berpengalaman dalam pengelolaan jurnal bergengsi dan publikasinya tersebar di lingkup nasional maupun internasional.


Publication Frequency

Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika terbit sebanyak enam kali dalam satu tahun yaitu pada bulan Januari, Maret, Mei, Juli, September, dan November pada masing-masing volume.


Open Access Policy

Jurnal ini memberikan akses terbuka langsung ke kontennya berdasarkan prinsip bahwa membuat penelitian tersedia secara bebas untuk umum mendukung pertukaran pengetahuan global yang lebih besar.


Screening for Plagiarism

Naskah yang diserahkan ke jurnal ini akan dicek plagiarisme melalui Turnitin dan maksimal plagiasi adalah 25%


Digital Archiving

Jurnal ini menggunakan sistem Indonesian Scientific Journal Database (ISJD) dan Indonesian Publication Index(IPI) untuk membuat sistem pengarsipan distribusi di antara perpustakaan yang berpartisipasi dan mengizinkan perpustakaan tersebut membuat arsip permanen jurnal untuk tujuan pelestarian dan pemulihan.


Journal Publishing Fee

Jurnal Imajiner memungut biaya untuk pemrosesan artikel (APC) yaitu Rp 150.000,00.


Publication Ethics

Publication Ethic
The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Semarang as publisher of Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika journal takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Universitas PGRI Semarang and Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.
The editor of the Imajiner: Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play
An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest
Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers
Contribution to Editorial Decisions
Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity
Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors
Reporting Standards
Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Data Access and Retention
Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

Originality and Plagiarism
The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Consurrent Publication
An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources
Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Confilcts of Interest
All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental Errors in Published Works
When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.