Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Ruang lingkup JIPETIK adalah sebagai berikut :

  • Models, Methods and Techniques
    • Conceptual Modeling, Languages and design
    • Software Engineering
    • Human Computer Interaction
    • Media, Game and Mobile Technologies
    • Data Mining
    • Information Security
    • Image Processing and Pattern Recognition
    • Natural Language Processing
  • Domain Specific Frameworks and Applications
    • IT Management dan IT Governance
    • e-Government
    • e-Healthcare, e-Learning, e-Manufacturing, e-Commerce
    • ERP dan Supply Chain Management
    • Business Process Management
  • Smart Systems
    • Smart City
    • Smart Cloud Technology
    • Smart Appliances & Wearable Computing Devices
    • Robotic Systems

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Proses Peer Review

Artikel-artikel yang dimuat di JIPETIK, sudah melalui proses review substansi minimal oleh 2 orang reviewer secara double blind peer review. Pre-review artikel akan dilakukan untuk melihat kesesuaian format halaman, gambar, tabel, sitasi dan daftar referensi serta sistematika pembaban artikel. Pemeriksaan unsur plagiasi dilakukan melalui pencarian di Google Scholar dan Turnitin.

Reviewer dapat meminta review ulang setelah penulis merevisi artikelnya. Keputusan diterima tidaknya artikel menjadi kewenangan Ketua Editor berdasarkan rekomendasi dari para reviewer

 

Publication Frequency

Frekuensi Penerbitan

JIPETIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian  Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer, diagendakan akan menerbitkan 2 (dua) nomor setiap tahun, yaitu terbit di bulan  Juni dan Desember. Dimulai pada Vol. 1 dan No. 1 pada bulan Juni 2020

JIPETIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian  Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer,menerima artikel setiap waktu, akan tetapi redaksi tidak bisa menjamin untuk terbit di penerbitan terdekat.

Artikel yang terbit di JTIIK tersedia secara online dan bebas diakses fulltext-nya dari alamat  http://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/jipetik

 

Open Access Policy

JIPETIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian  Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer menyediakan akses terbuka atas artikel-artikel yang dipublikasikan dengan prinsip dasar untuk menyebarkan hasil-hasil penelitian kepada publik guna mendukung perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan pada bidang teknologi informasi dan komputer

 

Archiving

OJS support LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe). Sebuah sistem untuk mengarsipkan jurnal secara permanen dan aman. LOCKSS adalah perangkat lunak open source yang dikembangkan di Library of Stanford University yang memungkinkan perpustakaan untuk menjaga website jurnal yang dipilih dengan mengumpulkan backup data secara teratur dari website jurnal yang terdaftar untuk konten yang baru diterbitkan dan mengarsipkannya. Tiap arsip divalidasi secara terus menerus terhadap library caches yang lain, dan jika konten ditemukan dalam keadaan rusak atau hilang, caches atau jurnal yang lain digunakan untuk menyimpan ulang. .....

 

Pembatalan Naskah

Penulis tidak diperbolehkan untuk membatalkan naskah yang sudah dikirimkan karena pembatalan atau penarikan naskah merupakan pekerjaan sia-sia (pemborosan tenaga dan waktu) yang dilakukan oleh editor atau reviewer.

Jika penulis tetap ingin membatalkan naskah yang dikirimkan, penulis akan dikenakan denda sebesar Rp. 300.000,- (tiga ratus ribu rupiah). Pembatalan akan dikerjakan oleh editor, jika penulis sudah melakukan pembayaran dan mengirimkan tanda bukti pembayaran ke redaksi JIPETIK.

Jika penulis tidak setuju untuk membayar denda, maka penulis akan masuk dalam daftar hitam (black list) untuk publikasi pada JIPETIK. Bahkan naskah sebelumnya yang sudah pernah diterbitkan akan dihapus dalam JIPETIK. Didalam daftar hitam akan ditulis nama lengkap penulis, email semua penulis, dan afiliasi dari penulis

 

Penulis Tanpa Kejelasan Terhadap Naskah

Penulis yang telah mengirimkan naskah dan sudah melewati proses review, serta hasil dari review sudah disampaikan oleh editor kepada penulis. Namun, tidak ada respon (tanggapan) dari penulis untuk diperbaiki naskah tersebut dalam jangka waktu lebih dari 6 bulan, sehingga naskah tersebut masih dalam status aktif di sistem online JIPETIK. Dikarenakan hal tersebut, editor dan reviewer telah melakukan pekerjaan sia-sia (pemborosan tenaga dan waktu).

Terhadap penulis yang demikian, maka penulis akan masuk dalam daftar hitam (black list) untuk publikasi pada JIPETIK. Bahkan naskah sebelumnya yang sudah pernah diterbitkan akan dihapus dalam JIPETIK. Didalam daftar hitam akan ditulis nama lengkap penulis, email semua penulis, dan afiliasi dari penulis

 

Publication Ethics

JIPETIK : Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Teknologi Informasi dan Komputer publication ethics refers to the Publication Ethics Committee (COPE) on Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Publication ethics documents for authors and editors can be seen at the following link.

International standards for authors

International standards for editors

The duties of the author, editors, and reviewers are described as bellows.
 

Duties of Authors

  1. Reporting Standards: 
    Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

  2. Data Access and Retention: 

Authors are asked to provide the raw data in connection with a paper for editorial review, and should be prepared to provide public access to such data (consistent with the ALPSP-STM Statement on Data and Databases), if practicable, and should in any event be prepared to retain such data for a reasonable time after publication.

  1. Originality and Plagiarism: The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

  2. Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication: 
    An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

  3. Acknowledgement of Sources: 
    Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

  4. Authorship of the Paper: 
    Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

  5. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
    All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

  6. Fundamental errors in published works: 
    When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.

  7. Hazards and Human or Animal Subjects: 
    If the work involves chemicals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript.

Duties of Editors

  1. Fair Play: 
    An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

  2. Confidentiality: 
    The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

  3. Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest: 
    Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

  4. Publication Decisions: 
    The editor board journal is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

  5. Review of Manuscripts: 
    The editor must ensure that each manuscript is initially evaluated by the editor for originality. The editor should organize and use peer review fairly and wisely. Editors should explain their peer review processes in the information for authors and also indicate which parts of the journal are peer-reviewed. The editor should use appropriate peer reviewers for papers that are considered for publication by selecting people with sufficient expertise and avoiding those with conflicts of interest.

Duties of Reviewers

  1. Contribution to Editorial Decisions:
    Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

  2. Promptness: 
    Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process

  3. Standards of Objectivity: 
    Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

  4. Confidentiality: 
    Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

  5. Disclosure and Conflict of Interest: 
    Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

  6. Acknowledgement of Sources: 
    Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

 

Screening Plagiarism

The manuscript that submitted into this journal will be screened for plagiarism using https://www.turnitin.com/

 

Author Fees

 

Author Guidelines