ANALISIS LIFE CYCLE COST PERKERASAN KAKU DAN LENTUR JALAN PROVINSI (STUDI KASUS: JALAN RAYA PARE – KEDIRI)

Gita Rizqi Hermastuti, Abdiyah Amudi

Abstract


Pare-Kediri Highway is a provincial road which is the main connecting road between Pare and Kediri City. On this road section is often bypassed by vehicles with large loads. However, in existing conditions there is damage that varies. Road planning is generally planned to be used for a certain period of time, for example 10 to 20 years depending on existing transportation needs, in the hope that the road will remain in good condition and suitable for traffic. Road maintenance measures are necessary to ensure good operating conditions throughout the planning period. Maintenance and repair of damaged roads also cost a lot. As a result evaluating road damage and choosing the right type of repair is very important. According to the results of research with the 2017 pavement Design Manual guidelines, flexible pavement thickness was obtained including AC-WC 4 cm, AC-BC 6 cm, AC-Base 16 cm and Class A aggregate foundation layer 15 cm. While the thickness of the rigid pavement using continuous concrete without reinforcement with 30 MPa quality concrete obtained plate thickness of 28.5 cm and a layer of thin concrete foundation (LMC) 10 cm. Based on data processing, the construction cost of flexible pavement amounted to Rp 12,958,812,587.00 while rigid pavement amounted to Rp 30,584,262,345. 00. The Total maintenance cost for flexible pavement is Rp 23,836,678,414.33 while for rigid pavement is Rp 3,208,462,265. 15. So that the results of life cycle cost analysis of this study obtained the total cost during the 20-year life cycle of flexible pavement of Rp 36,795,491,001.33 while rigid pavement of Rp 33,792,724,610. 15. In this case, rigid pavement has a life cycle cost (life cycle cost) which is 8.51% more efficient than flexible pavement.

Keywords


Flexible Pavement; Rigid Pavement; Life Cycle Cost

Full Text:

PDF

References


De Porter, Bobbi dan Hernacki, Mike. (1992). Quantum Learning. Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan. Terjemahan oleh Alwiyah Abdurrahman. Bandung: Penerbit Kaifa.

Sujimat, D. Agus. (2000). Penulisan karya ilmiah. Makalah disampaikan pada pelatihan penelitian bagi guru SLTP Negeri di Kabupaten Sidoarjo tanggal 19 Oktober 2000 (Tidak diterbitkan). MKKS SLTP Negeri Kabupaten Sidoarjo

Suparno. (2000). Langkah-langkah Penulisan Artikel Ilmiah dalam Saukah, Ali dan Waseso, M.G. 2000. Menulis Artikel untuk Jurnal Ilmiah. Malang: UM Press.

UNESA. (2000). Pedoman Penulisan Artikel Jurnal, Surabaya: Lembaga Penelitian Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Wahab, Abdul dan Lestari, Lies Amin. (1999). Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Winardi, Gunawan. (2002). Panduan Mempersiapkan Tulisan Ilmiah. Bandung: Akatiga.

Ade, Mulyawan; (2019). Simulasi Biaya Penanganan Jalan Antara Perkerasan Kaku dan Perkerasan Lentur. 9(2):153-64.

Bank Indonesia. (2022)a. BI 7-Day Reverse Repo Rate. Https://www.Bi.Go.Id/Id/Statistik/Indikator/Bi-7day_Rr.Aspx (1).

Bank Indonesia. (2022)b. Data Inflasi. Http://www.Bi.Go.Id/Id/Statistik/Indikator/Data-Inflasi.aspx (1):39-40

Betamal, Fendy Nur. (2015). Analisa Life Cycle Cost Perkerasan Kaku dan Lentur jalan nasional (Studi kasus: Jalan Batas Kota Bojonegoro-Padangan).

Ditrektorat Jendral Bina Marga. (2003). Pd–T–14–2003. Https://Binamarga.Pu.Go.Id/Index.Php/Nspk/Detail/Pedoman-Perencanaan-Perkerasan-Jalan-Beton-Semen

Ditrektorat Jendral Bina Marga. (2004). Pd–T–12–2004-B. https://binamarga.pu.go.id/index.php/nspk/detail/penempatan-marka-jalan

Hendriansyah, Galang Chesar. (2022). Analisis Pemilihan Perkerasan Lentur dan Kaku Berdasarkan Life Cycle Cost Analysis di Kota Kediri

Kementrian PUPR. (2017). Manual Desain Perkerasan Jalan 2017. NO 04/SE/Db/2017.

Muthaher, Andi Mufli Marzaq. (2017). Penerapan Metode Analisa Manfaat Biaya Pada Penilaian Kelayakan Pembangunan Infrastruktur Jalan. 152.

Pemerintah Indonesia. (2004). Undang Undang Nomor 38 Tahun 2004 Tentang Jalan. International Journal of Tropical Insect Sciene 8(4):104 – 10.

Rosalina, M., and P. Mahardi. (2019). Pemodelan Biaya Desain Antara Perkerasan Lentur dan Perkerasan Kaku Berdasarkan Metode Bina Marga 2017. Rekayasa Teknik Sipil 1-8.

Sentot Hardwiyono. (2013). Metode Pelaksanaan Perkerasan Jalan. 259.

Sukirman, S. (2003). Perkerasan Jalan Raya. Bandung: Nova.

Sukirman, S. (1999). Perkerasan Lentur Jalan Raya. Bandung: Nova.

Swandari, Tintany, Akhmad Hasanuddin, and Willy Kriswardhana. (2021). Perbandingan Life Cycle Cost Perkerasan Kaku Dan Lentur (Studi Kasus: Jalan Lintas Selatan Jarit-Puger STA 25+500-STA 40+400). Jurnal Rekayasa Sipil (JRS-Unand) 17(2):164. doi: 10.25077/jrs.17.2.164-175.2021

Widayanti, Ari, Ria Asih Aryani Soemitro, Januarti Jaya Ekaputri, and Hitapriya Suprayitno. (2018). Kinerja Campuran Aspal Beton Dengan Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement Dari Jalan Nasional Di Provinsi Jawa Timur. Jurnal Manajemen Aset Infrastruktur & Fasilitas 2(1):35-43.

Wisena, Surya. (2015). Analisa Life Cycle Cost Pada Proyek Pembangunan. 1-10




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/giratory.v1i1.19453

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Jurnal Teknik Sipil Giratory UPGRIS

Program Studi Teknik Sipil

Fakultas Teknik dan Informatika

Universitas PGRI Semarang