PERAN PEJABAT PEMBUAT KOMITMEN SEBAGAI PENGENDALI FUNGSI DALAM PEMBANGUNAN LANJUTAN LABORATORIUM B2P2TOOT TAWANGMANGU

Derry Sulisti Adi Putra, Latifa Shafa Maura Selohadi

Abstract


Pembangunan gudang logistik Polres Lamongan, sebagai salah satu elemen infrastruktur publik, perlu dilakukan pengawasan dengan tingkat efisiensi yang tinggi untuk mendukung kebutuhan operasional kepolisian. Beberapa masalah operasional telah muncul yang menghambat penyelesaian tepat waktu. Salah satu masalah utama yang dihadapi adalah keterlambatan dalam pengiriman material yang sangat mempengaruhi kelancaran pekerjaan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi keterlambatan dalam proyek pembangunan Gudang Logistik Polres Lamongan, dengan fokus pada peran kontraktor, supplier, konsultan, dan pemilik proyek. Melalui pendekatan kuantitatif, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor internal dan eksternal yang dapat menyebabkan keterlambatan proyek konstruksi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini meliputi analisis regresi linier berganda untuk menentukan hubungan antara variabel independen (lingkungan kerja, keterlambatan material, peralatan, tenaga kerja, dan perubahan desain) dengan keterlambatan pelaksanaan pekerjaan.

Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa faktor tenaga kerja memiliki pengaruh terbesar terhadap keterlambatan proyek, dengan nilai beta 0,455, diikuti oleh perubahan desain yang memiliki pengaruh positif meskipun kecil. Sementara itu, faktor lingkungan kerja, keterlambatan material, dan peralatan tidak menunjukkan pengaruh signifikan. Untuk mengatasi keterlambatan, penelitian ini merekomendasikan perbaikan dalam koordinasi antar pihak terkait, manajemen sumber daya yang lebih baik, dan perencanaan yang lebih matang. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan yang penting untuk meningkatkan pengelolaan proyek konstruksi dan mencegah keterlambatan yang tidak terduga pada proyek-proyek serupa di masa depan.



Keywords


Hipotesis Sapir-Whorf; Metafora Konseptual; Bahasa dan Pikiran; Sains Kognitif

References


Casasanto, D. (2009). When is a linguistic metaphor a cnoceptual metaphor? In V. Evans & S. Pourcel (Eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 127–145). John Benjamins.

D’Andrade, R. (1987). A folk model of the mind (pp. 112–147). Cambridge University Press.

Dirven, R., Polzenhagen, F., & Wolf, H.-G. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics, Ideology, and Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1222–1240). Oxford University Press.

Evans, V., & Green, M. C. (2006). Cognitive Linguistics: An Introduction. Edinburgh University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2003). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities (1. paperback ed). Basic Books.

Fishman, J. A. (1960). A systematization of the Whorfian hypothesis. Behavioral Science, 5(4), 323–339. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830050407

Flusberg, S. J., Matlock, T., & Thibodeau, P. H. (2018). War metaphors in public discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1407992

Indirasari, D. T. (2018). Time Metaphors in Indonesian Language: A Preliminary Study. In Diversity in Unity: Perspectives from Psychology and Behavioral Sciences (pp. 467–172). Taylor & Francis Group.

Johnson, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago University Press.

Keating, J. (2021). Populist discourse and active metaphors in the 2016 US presidential elections. Intercultural Pragmatics, 18(4), 499–531. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2021-4004

Kövecses, Z. (1999). Metaphor: Does it constitute or reflect cultural models? In R. W. Gibbs Jr. & G. J. Steen (Eds.), Metaphor in cognitive linguistics (pp. 167–188). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.10kov

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal About the Mind. University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1990). The Invariance Hypothesis: Is abstract reason based on image-schemas? Cognitive Linguistics, 1(1), 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1990.1.1.39

Lakoff, G. (1996). Moral Politics: How Liberals and Conservatives Think. Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor We Live By. Chicago University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy In The Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. Basic Books.

Lee, P. (1996). The Whorf Theory Complex: A Critical Reconstruction. John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Lucy, J. (2001). Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis. In N. J. Smelser & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 13486–13490). Pergamon.

Mannoni, M. (2021). Rights Metaphors Across Hybrid Legal Languages, Such as Euro English and Legal Chinese. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 34(5), 11399. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-020-09814-6

Nerlich, B., & Clarke, D. D. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and the History of Linguistics. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 589–607). Oxford University Press.

Oakley, T. (2007). Image Schemas. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 214–235). Oxford University Press.

Olofson, J. K., & Wilson, D. A. (2018). Human Olfaction: It Takes Two Villages. Current Biology, 28(3), R108–R110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.12.016

Panzeri, F., Domaneschi, F., & Di Paola, S. (2021). Does the COVID-19 war metaphor influence reasoning? PLoSONE, 16(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250651

Pederson, E. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and Linguistic Relativity. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1012–1044). Oxford University Press.

Penn, J. M. (1972). Linguistic Relativity versus Innate Ideas: The origin of the Sapir-Whorf hypothesis in German thought. Mouton & Co N.V. Publisher, The Hague.

Preux, A. D. de S., & Blanco, O. (2021). The power of conceptual metaphors in the age of pandemic: The influence of the WAR and SPORT domains on emotions and thoughts. Language & Communication, 81, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2021.08.003

Quinn, D., & Holland, N. (Eds.). (1987). Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge University Press.

Quinn, N. (1987). Convergent evidence for a cultural model of American marriage. In N. Holland & N. Quinn (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 173–192). Cambridge University Press.

Rohrer, T. (2007). Embodiment and Experientialism. In The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 25–47). Oxford University Press.

Sapir, E. (1949). Selected Writings of Edward Sapir in Language, Culture and Personality (D. G. Mandelbaum, Ed.). University of California Press.

Semino, E. (2020). “Not Soldiers but Fire-fighters†– Metaphors and Covid-19. Health Communication, 36(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2020.1844989

Siuda-Krzywicka, K., Witzel, C., Chabani, E., Taga, M., & Coste, C. (2019). Color Categorization Independent of Color Naming. Cell Reports, 28(10), 2471–2479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.003

Stanulewicz, D. (1999). Benjamin Lee Whorf and cognitive linguistics. In J. Arabski (Ed.), Pase papers in language studies: Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English (pp. 191–198). Para.

Thibodeau, P. H., Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). How Linguistic Metaphor Scaffolds Reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, xx(yy), 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2017.07.001

Tomasello, M. (2007). Cognitive Linguistics and First Language Acquisition. In D. Geeraerts & H. Cuyckens (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics (pp. 1092–1112). Oxford University Press.

Wicke, P., & Bolognesi, M. M. (2020). Framing COVID-19: How we conceptualize and discuss the pandemic on Twitter. PLoSONE, 15(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240010

Zhou, P., Critchley, H., Garfinkel, S., & Gao, Y. (2021). The conceptualization of emotions across cultures: A model based on interoceptive neuroscience. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 125(2021), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.023




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/mf.v1i1.10694

DOI (PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)): https://doi.org/10.26877/mf.v1i1.10694.g5023

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.