ANALISIS DESKRIPSI PENGARUH WORK ENGAGEMENT TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN: ABILITY (A), EFFORT (E), SUPPORT (S) PT SURVEYOR INDONESIA
Abstract
Abstrak
Work engagement adalah seperangkat sikap kerja yang membawa karyawan untuk merasakan emosi positif terhadap pekerjaan mereka untuk menjadi pribadi yang bermakna,mempertimbangkan beban kerja mereka untuk dikelola, dan memiliki harapan tentang masa depan pekerjaan mereka. Metodologi penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantatif dengan populasi target dalam studi ini adalah karyawan PT Surveyor Indonesia yang menjabat sebagai kepala bagian (kabag) sebanyak 120 orang. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner skala likert. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa workengagement mempunyai rentang skor teoretik antara 30 sampai 150, dan rentang skor empiris antara 113 sampai dengan 145. Hasil perhitungan data diperoleh rata-rata sebesar 130,63; simpangan baku sebesar 7,04; varians sebesar 49,5542; median sebesar 130,0; dan modus sebesar 131.Nilai koefisien jalur work engagement terhadap kinerja karyawan sebesar 0,363 dengan nilai thitung sebesar 5,24. Oleh karena nilai thitung lebih besar dari nilai ttabel pada dk = 88 untuk α = 0,05 sebesar 1,99 maka H0 ditolak dan H1 diterima, yang berarti terdapat pengaruh langsung positif variabel work engagement terhadap variabel kinerja karyawan. Implikasinya penelitian ini adalah bahwa Work engagement berpengaruh langsung positif terhadap kinerja karyawan. Berarti bahwa kinerja karyawan PT. Surveyor Indonesia dapat ditingkatkan dengan memperbaiki work engagement.
Abstract
The problem of this research is how does the de Work engagement is a set of work attitudes that bring employees to feel positive emotions towards their work to be meaningful personal, consider their workload to be managed, and have hope about the future of their work. The methodology of this study uses a quantative approach with the target population in this study are employees of PT Surveyor Indonesia who served as head of the section (kabag) as many as 120 people. The technique of collecting data using the Likert scale questionnaire. The results showed that workengagement had a theoretical score range between 30 to 150, and a range of empirical scores between 113 and 145. The results of the calculation of data obtained an average of 130.63; standard deviation of 7.04; variance of 49.5542; median of 130.0; and mode equal to 131. The value of work engagement path coefficient on employee performance is 0.363 with a tcount of 5.24. Because the value of tcount is greater than the value of t table at dk = 88 for α = 0.05 at 1.99, H0 is rejected and H1 is accepted, which means that there is a positive direct effect of work engagement variable on employee performance variables. The implication of this study is that Work engagement has a positive direct effect on employee performance. Means that the performance of employees of PT. Surveyor Indonesia can be improved by improving work engagement.Keywords: Work engagement, employee performance
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
BPS Kabupaten Rembang, Indikator Alan M. Saks, Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 2016, Vol. 21 No. 7, hh. 600-619.
Chuck Williams, Management 6 edition (USA: South Western Cengange Learning, 2011), h.493
Endah Mujiarsih dan Ika Jenita Ratnaningsih, “Meningkatkan Work Engagement Melalui Gaya Kepemimpinan Transformasional dan Budaya Organisasi”, Artikel eprint.unisbank.ac.id. 2012, hh. 1-12.
Frank J. Landy dan Jeffrey M. Conte, Work in The 21st Century: An Introduction to Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Mason: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013), h. 157.
Harter J.K., Schmidt F.L. and Hayes, T.L. “Business Unit Level Relationship Between Employee Satisfaction, Employee Engagement, and Business Outcomes: A Meta Analysis”, Journal of Applied Psychology, volume 2, 2002, hh. 268-279.
Jarunne Saetang et al., Factors Affecting Preceived Job Performance among Staff: A Case Study Of Ban Karuna Juvenile Vocational Training Centre For Boys, The Journal Of Behavioral Science, 2010, Vol. 5. No.1, 33-45.,h.34
Jennifer M. George and Gareth R Jones, Organizational Behavior, Third Edition (New York: Prentice Hall. 2002), h. 249.
John M.Ivancevich, Robert Konopaske, Michael T. Matteson, Organizational Behavior and Management 10 edition (New York: McGraw Hill, 2014), h.172
Kahn, William A. "Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work." Academy of Management Journal. Dec 1990; 33, 4; ProQuest. h. 692
Madhura Bedarkar, Deepika Pandita, “A study on the Drivers Of Employee Engagement Impacting Employee Performance”, Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 133, 2014, hh. 106-115.
Mathis, Robert L., and Jackson, John H., Human Resources Management, (USA: Cengage Learning, 2011) , h. 156
Michael A. Richard, William G. Emener, dan Willian S. Hutchison, Jr., Employee Assistance Programs: Wellness/Enhancement Programming (Illinois : Charles C Thomas Publisher, Ltd., 2009), h. 33.
Naresh K, Malhotra, Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation (New Jersey:Prentice Hall, Inc., 1999), h. 93.
Nurofia, Fifi. Resilience pada wanita bekerja. Buku Panduan Acara dan Kumpulan Abstrak Temu Ilmiah Nasional dan Kongres XI Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia (HIMPSI): Dalam Keberagaman Menuju Indonesia yang Lebih Baik. Himpunan Psikologi Indonesia. 2010. h. 95.
Pati, Surya Prakash. Employee Engagement: Role of Self-Efficacy, Organizational Support & Supervisor Support. The Indian Journal of Industrial Relations. Vol 46. No 1. P 2010. hh. 126 – 137.
Riduwan dan Engkos Achmad Kuncoro, Cara Menggunakan dan Memaknai Path Analysis (Analisis Jalur)(Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012), h. 44.
Robertson-Smith, G.and Markwick, C., “Employee Engagement: A Review of Current Thinking”, Institute for Employment Studies, 2009.
Sabah Agha, et al.”Effect of Core Competence on Competitive Advantage and Organizational Performance”. International Journal of Business and Management Vol. 7, No. 1 (Januari 2012), pp. 192 – 204
W.B Schaufeli, Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A.B., “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 2012, Vol. 3, hh. 71-92.
Wan Suziana Wan Sulaiman, et al. “Job Performance: Relationship between Competency and Attitude towards Achieving Tnb’s Vision”. Journal of Advanced Social Research Vol.3 No.1(January 2013), pp. 1-11.
Wellins, R., & Concelman, J. (2005). Creating a culture for engagement. Workforce Performace Solutions (www.wpsmag.com). Retrieved, October 2, 2008, from www.ddiworld.com/pdf/wps_engagement_ar.pdf.
Madhura Bedarkar, Deepika Pandita, “A study on the Drivers of Employee Engagement Impacting Employee Performance”, Social and Behavioral Sciences. Volume 133, 2014, hh. 106-115.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/sta.v2i1.4033
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.