Conceptual Metaphors in Perfume Product Reviews on the TikTok Online Platform

Gilang Kusnadi

Abstract


This study examines the use of conceptual metaphors in perfume product reviews on the TikTok platform, focusing on gender-based representational differences. Using a qualitative descriptive approach, data were collected from six TikTok accounts three male and three female perfume reviewers based on video content published between May and June 2025. The data consist of verbal expressions used to describe fragrance characteristics, performance, and experiential impressions, which were transcribed and analyzed through conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual blending theory. The findings indicate that female reviewers predominantly employ emotional, narrative-driven metaphors that construct imaginative and atmospheric representations of perfumes, emphasizing mood, aesthetics, and sensory imagination. In contrast, male reviewers tend to use metaphors centered on functionality, projection, strength, and situational suitability, frequently drawing on source domains related to physical force, sound, and performance. These patterns demonstrate how metaphor functions as a cognitive mechanism that enables reviewers to conceptualize and communicate abstract olfactory experiences that cannot be directly accessed through digital media, rather than merely serving decorative linguistic purposes. Furthermore, the interaction of sensory, emotional, and cultural domains highlights the role of conceptual blending in generating novel meanings in digital fragrance discourse. The study also reveals that reviewers’ metaphorical choices, evaluative focus, and communicative tone reflect gender identity, indicating a close relationship between metaphor usage and identity performance in online environments. Overall, this study enriches cognitive linguistic research on digital discourse, provides insights into gendered language practices in social media marketing, and deepens our understanding of non-visual sensory product representations on online platforms.

Keywords


cognitive linguistics; digital discourse; gender representation; sensory communication; social media marketing

Full Text:

PDF

References


Afriansyah, T., & Zakiyah, M. (2022). Metafora Aktivitas Manusia Dalam Kosakata Kekinian Bahasa Indonesia: Kajian Semantik Kognitif. Semantik, 11(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.22460/semantik.v11i2.p229-244

Alqarni, S. M. (2022). Conceptual Metaphors and the Smell Perception in English and Arabic. 14(6). https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v14i6.20517

Azhari. (2025). The Influence Of Social Media On Consumer Behavior And Marketing Strategy: Literature Review Analysis. JurnalEkonomiIchsanSidenrengRappang, 4(1), 400–413. https://doi.org/https//doi.org/10.61912/jeinsa.v4i1.186

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). CA: SAGE Publications.

Domingo, M. (2021). Perceived Role of Social Media in the Vocabulary Development of University Students. ALLURE Journal, 1, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v1i1.9269

Eckert, P., & McConnell-Ginet, S. (2013). Language and Gender (2nd ed). Cambridge University Press.

Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.

Forceville, C. (2008). Metaphor in pictures and multimodal representations. Cambridge University Press.

IDwebhost. (2025). Strategi Hook dalam Video TikTok untuk Meningkatkan Jangkauan. https://idwebhost.com/blog

Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd ed). Oxford University Press.

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge.

Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(22), 332–351.

Kusumasari. (2024). Analisis Pengaruh Review Onlinedan Rating Produk Terhadap Pengambilan Keputusan Konsumen Dishopee. Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen Dan Akuntansi, 1192, 854–863.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphor We Live By. University of Chicago Press.

Merriam & Tisdell. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage.

Mutia, R. D., & Sari, D. U. (2024). Analisis Konten Strategi Komunikasi Pemasaran Produk Parfum Bermerek Lokal HMNS Melalui Media Sosial Instagram. Jurnal Penelitian Inovatif, 4(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.54082/jupin.255

Nurbani, A., & Barlian, E. (2022). Metafora Ontologis dalam Tajuk Berita ILM COVID-19. Jurnal Bahasa Dan Media, 77–88.

Smith, J. (2020). Online Consumerism: Platforms, Persuasion, and Purchase Intent. Journal of Online Marketing, 188–205.

Speed, L. J., O’Meara, C., Roque, L., & Majid, A. (2019). The linguistic encoding of sensory experience. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 4(1), 1–22.

Suci Niswatussolihah, Beby Karina Fawzeea Sembiring, Marhayanie Marhayanie, & Setri Hiyanti Siregar. (2023). Pengaruh Social Media Marketing, Perceived Quality Dan Online Customer Review Terhadap Minat Beli Parfum Local Brand Hmns Pada Pengguna Instagram Dan Twitter. Jurnal Penelitian Ekonomi Manajemen Dan Bisnis, 2(4), 244–263. https://doi.org/10.55606/jekombis.v2i4.2596

Tannen, D. (1990). ou Just Don’t Understand: Women and Men in Conversation. William Morrow.

Zappavigna, M. (2012). Discourse of Twitter and social media. Continuum.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/allure.v6i1.26144

Refbacks



Copyright (c) 2026 Gilang Kusnadi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.