Instructional Tasks for Fostering Scientific Creativity in Physics Education: A Systematic Review (2020–2024)

Joko Saefan, Wawan Kurniawan, Nur Widya Rini

Abstract


This systematic literature review explores research on scientific creativity in physics education published between 2020 and 2024, with a particular focus on the intersection of instructional tasks and physics topics. Using PRISMA-based identification, screening, eligibility, and synthesis procedures, 130 initial records from Scopus were narrowed to 20 eligible studies that explicitly addressed both instructional task types and physics-related content. Instructional tasks were classified into seven categories as problem finding, open-ended problem solving, creative experiment design, hypothesis generation, modeling tasks, product improvement, and interdisciplinary tasks, while physics topics were coded from domain-specific subjects to broader categories. Findings indicate a strong dominance of modeling tasks, particularly when paired with general topics, reflecting their adaptability to varied instructional contexts and alignment with STEM or STEAM frameworks. In contrast, tasks such as creative experiment design and product improvement were less represented, and domain-specific topics appeared infrequently. This pattern suggests a tendency toward flexible but generalized approaches to fostering creativity, potentially at the expense of deep disciplinary engagement. The review highlights the need to diversify instructional tasks and embed creative learning within core physics content. These insights carry implications for curriculum design, teacher professional development, and future research aiming to balance interdisciplinary breadth with disciplinary depth in promoting scientific creativity in physics education.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Hu W and Adey P 2002 A scientific creativity test for secondary school students International Journal of Science Education 24(4) p 389–403 doi: 10.1080/09500690110098912.

Kind P and Kind V 2007 Creativity in Science Education: Perspectives and Challenges for Developing School Science Studies in Science Education 43(1) p 1–37 doi: 10.1080/03057260708560225

Beghetto R A and Kaufman J C 2014 Classroom contexts for creativity High Ability Studies 25(1) p 53–69 doi: 10.1080/13598139.2014.905247

Sugita M I, Hartono, and Sutikno 2021 Implementation of creative physics experiment on the creativity of students’ ability J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1918(2) p 022007 doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1918/2/022007

Xu S, Reiss M J, and Lodge W 2024 Enhancing scientific creativity through an inquiry-based teaching approach in secondary science classrooms International Journal of Science Education p 1–18 doi: 10.1080/09500693.2024.2419987

Pinar F I L, Panergayo A A E, Sagcal R R, Acut D P, Roleda L S, and Prudente M S 2025 Fostering scientific creativity in science education through scientific problem-solving approaches and STEM contexts: a meta-analysis Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 7(1) p 18 doi: 10.1186/s43031-025-00137-9

Borish V, Hoehn J R, and Lewandowski H J 2022 Student engagement with modeling in multiweek student-designed lab projects Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18(2) p 020135 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020135

Bolger M S, Osness J B, Gouvea J S, and Cooper A C 2021 Supporting Scientific Practice through Model-Based Inquiry: A Students’-Eye View of Grappling with Data, Uncertainty, and Community in a Laboratory Experience CBE Life Sci. Educ. 20(4) p ar59 doi: 10.1187/cbe.21-05-0128.

Valeeva R, Biktagirova G, Lesev V, Mikhailenko O, Skudareva G, and Valentovinis A 2023 Exploring the impact of modeling in science education: A systematic review EURASIA J Math Sci. Tech. Ed. 19(6) p em2284 doi: 10.29333/ejmste/13268.

Panergayo A A and Prudente M 2024 Effectiveness of Design-based Learning in Enhancing Scientific Creativity in STEM Education: A Meta-analysis International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology 12(5) p 1182–1196 doi: 10.46328/ijemst.4306.

Pont-Niclòs I, Martín-Ezpeleta A, and Echegoyen-Sanz Y 2024 Scientific creativity in secondary students and its relationship with STEM-related attitudes, engagement and work intentions Front. Educ. 9 p 1382541 doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1382541.

Krathwohl D R 2002 A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview Theory Into Practice 41(4) p 212–218 doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2

Page M J et al. 2021 The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews BMJ 372 p n71 doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

Ivanjek L et al. 2022 Studying physics during the COVID-19 pandemic: Student perceptions on synchronous and asynchronous course formats and implications for the future Phys. Rev. Phys. Educ. Res. 18(2) p 020149 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020149

Bilgin B and Güler A M 2024 Impact of COVID-19 on student performance in a physics laboratory course Social Sciences & Humanities Open 10 p 101121 doi: 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101121.

Tardy C 2004 The role of English in scientific communication: lingua franca or Tyrannosaurus rex? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 3(3) p 247–269 doi: 10.1016/j.jeap.2003.10.001

Kamadjeu R 2019 English: the lingua franca of scientific research The Lancet Global Health 7(9) p e1174 doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30258-X.

Nag S 2025 The importance of Conference Proceedings Clarivate [Online]. Available: https://clarivate.com/academia-government/webinars/the-importance-of-conference-proceedings/

Birukou A 2025 Guest Post - Everything* You Ever Wanted to Know about Conference Proceedings But Were Afraid to Ask The Scholarly Kitchen [Online]. Available: https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2020/01/30/guest-post-everything-you-ever-wanted-to-know-about-conference-proceedings-but-were-afraid-to-ask/

Piwowar H et al. 2018 The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles PeerJ 6 p e4375 doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375

Suyidno, Maharani K, Mahtari S, and Salam A 2024 Correlation between scientific creativity and students’ science attitude in Creative Responsibility-Based Learning integrated STEM from the Covid-19 pandemic AIP Conf. Proc. 3058(1) p 020018 doi: 10.1063/5.0202016.

Chiu M H and Lin J W 2019 Modeling competence in science education Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research 1(1) p 12 doi: 10.1186/s43031-019-0012-y

Papaevripidou M, Nicolaou C, and Constantinou C 2014 On Defining and Assessing Learners’ Modeling Competence in Science Teaching and Learning.

Siew N M and Ambo N 2020 The Scientific Creativity Of Fifth Graders In A Stem Project-Based Cooperative Learning Approach Problems of Education in the 21st Century 78 p 627–643 doi: 10.33225/pec/20.78.627.

Chr. Th. Nicolaou and C. P. Constantinou, “Assessment of the modeling competence: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research,” Educational Research Review 13 p 52–73, Dec. 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.001.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/lpt.v4i2.24435

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Lontar Physics Today

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Copyright of Lontar Physics Today  ISSN 2828-0970 (online)


Gedung Utama GU.2.01 FPMIPATI, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Jl. Lontar No. 1-Dr. Cipto, Kampus 1 UPGRIS, Semarang
Email:  [email protected]

View My Stats