Lexical and Phonological Relationship between Bulukumba Buginese and Toraja: A HistoricalComparative Study
Abstract
This study examines the lexical and phonological relationship between Bulukumba Buginese (BB) and Toraja (TL), with attention to local variety, cognate criteria, and recurrent sound correspondences. The dataset comprises 200 Swadesh basic-vocabulary meanings collected in 2026 from six native speakers, three per variety, through interviews, note-taking, and audio recording. The analysis combines lexicostatistics, glottochronology, phonemic-correspondence identification, and comparison with Proto-Austronesian (PAN) forms retained in the dataset. Eighty-seven related pairs were identified: 36 identical pairs, 20 pairs differing by one phoneme, 20 pairs supported by phonemic correspondence, and 11 pairs based on phonetic similarity. The resulting cognacy rate is 43.5%; excluding the 11 phonetic-similarity pairs reduces it to 38.0%, which remains within the same “family” band of the legacy lexicostatistical classification used in the study. With a retention constant of 0.805, the initial glottochronological estimate is approximately 1,919 years before 2026. Recalculation of the stated standard-error formula gives 0.0351 and a model-dependent range of approximately 2,097–1,740 years before 2026 (roughly 71 BCE–286 CE). Six correspondence sets are identified: /ŋ~n/, /w~b/, /ə~a/, /r~d/, /ø~k/, and /o~e/, with unequal evidential strength. PAN-oriented comparisons also show lenition, fortition, aphaeresis, apocope, syncope, and prothesis. The findings support BB–TL historical relatedness while showing that neither cognacy percentages nor glottochronological dates alone establish genealogical subgrouping.
Keywords
References
Afria, R., Izar, J., Prawolo, I. S., & Arezky, B. (2020). Relasi bahasa Melayu Riau, Bugis, dan Banjar: Kajian linguistik historis komparatif. Medan Makna: Jurnal Ilmu Kebahasaan dan Kesastraan, 18(1), 94–106. doi:10.26499/mm.v18i1.2330
Aisyah, S., & Widayati, D. (2022). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa Pesisir Pasar, Kampung, dan Sorkam (Kajian linguistik historis komparatif). Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal, 8(3), 2367–2376. doi:10.37905/aksara.8.3.2367-2376.2022
Anderson, C., Tresoldi, T., Chacon, T., Fehn, A.-M., Walworth, M., Forkel, R., & List, J.-M. (2018). A cross-linguistic database of phonetic transcription systems. Yearbook of the Poznan Linguistic Meeting, 4, 21–53. doi:10.2478/yplm-2018-0002
Batsuren, K., Bella, G., & Giunchiglia, F. (2022). A large and evolving cognate database. Language Resources and Evaluation, 56, 165–189. doi:10.1007/s10579-021-09544-6
Blust, R., Trussel, S., & Smith, A. D. (2023). CLDF dataset derived from Blust’s “Austronesian Comparative Dictionary” (Version 1.2) [Data set]. Zenodo. doi:10.5281/zenodo.7741197
Erniati. (2021). Klasifikasi leksikostatistik bahasa Banggoi dan bahasa Hoti di Kabupaten Seram Bagian Timur. Totobuang, 9(2), 239–255. doi:10.26499/ttbng.v9i2.333
Fadhila, A., Saddhono, K., & Suwandi, S. (2024). Kekerabatan bahasa Teringin dan bahasa Kampung Baru Kabupaten Kotawaringin Barat: Kajian linguistik historis komparatif. Bahtera Indonesia: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 9(2), 604–612. doi:10.31943/bi.v9i2.775
Hadi, N. R. P., & Kusumaningrum, S. (2020). Korespondensi fonemis bahasa Ogan dan bahasa Bangka: Kajian linguistik historis komparatif. Jurnal Culture, 7(2), 191–203. doi:10.53873/culture.v7i2.222
Jäger, G. (2018). Global-scale phylogenetic linguistic inference from lexical resources. Scientific Data, 5, 180189. doi:10.1038/sdata.2018.189
Jäger, G. (2019). Computational historical linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics, 45(3–4), 151–182. doi:10.1515/tl-2019-0011
Jannah, W., La Ino, & Zahrani. (2024). Kekerabatan bahasa Bugis dan bahasa Konjo Pesisir di Kabupaten Bulukumba (Linguistik bandingan historis). Cakrawala Listra: Jurnal Kajian Sastra, Bahasa, dan Budaya Indonesia, 7(1), 47–59. doi:10.33772/cakrawalalistra.v7i1.2724
Lailiyah, N., & Wijayanti, F. I. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Jawa, Bali dan Bima: Perspektif linguistik historis komparatif. Linguistik Indonesia, 40(2), 327–345. doi:10.26499/li.v40i2.308
List, J.-M., Greenhill, S. J., & Gray, R. D. (2017). The potential of automatic word comparison for historical linguistics. PLOS ONE, 12(1), e0170046. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0170046
Macklin-Cordes, J. L., Bowern, C., & Round, E. R. (2021). Phylogenetic signal in phonotactics. Diachronica, 38(2), 210–258. doi:10.1075/dia.20004.mac
Mahendra, D., & Hendrokumoro. (2022). Relasi kekerabatan bahasa Sasak dan bahasa Banjar. Deiksis, 14(2), 125–141. doi:10.30998/deiksis.v14i2.10316
Mahriyuni, Pramuniati, I., & Maftuhah, R. A. (2023). Lexicostatistics of Javanese and Sasak languages: Comparative historical linguistic studies. Mimbar Ilmu, 28(1), 124–130. doi:10.23887/mi.v28i1.59797
Mayangsari, D. (2020). Leksikostatistik bahasa Bugis dan bahasa Toraja (Lexicostatistic of Bugis language and Toraja language). Jalabahasa, 16(1), 83–96. doi:10.36567/jalabahasa.v16i1.471
Muhammad, S. R., & Hendrokumoro. (2022). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa Aceh dan bahasa Gayo: Kajian linguistik historis komparatif. Metahumaniora, 12(2), 171–180. doi:10.24198/metahumaniora.v12i2.40891
Padilla-Iglesias, C., Gjesfjeld, E., & Vinicius, L. (2020). Geographical and social isolation drive the evolution of Austronesian languages. PLOS ONE, 15(12), e0243171. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243171
Rama, T., List, J.-M., Wahle, J., & Jäger, G. (2018). Are automatic methods for cognate detection good enough for phylogenetic reconstruction in historical linguistics? In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 2 (Short Papers) (pp. 393–400). Association for Computational Linguistics. doi:10.18653/v1/N18-2063
Rizqi, F. A., & Widayati, D. (2021). Perubahan bunyi bahasa Proto Austronesia ke dalam bahasa Jawa dialek Sumatera (Kajian linguistik historis komparatif). Kulturistik: Jurnal Bahasa dan Budaya, 5(2), 29–35. doi:10.22225/kulturistik.5.2.3380
Sholeha, M., & Hendrokumoro. (2022). Kekerabatan bahasa Kerinci, Melayu Jambi, dan Minangkabau. Diglosia: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 5(2), 399–420. doi:10.30872/diglosia.v5i2.404
Sulistiyarini, S., & Hendrokumoro. (2023). Hubungan kekerabatan bahasa Jawa, Sunda, dan Makassar: Kajian linguistik historis komparatif. Madah: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 14(2), 187–202. doi:10.31503/madah.v14i2.633
Talaohu, A. R. (2019). The phonetics system in Buginese language. KLAUSA (Kajian Linguistik, Pembelajaran Bahasa, dan Sastra), 3(1), 23–44. doi:10.33479/klausa.v3i01.146
Utamayana, I. W. Y., Budasi, I. G., & Ramendra, D. P. (2025). Reflections of Proto-Austronesian in the Teta dialect. International Journal of Language and Literature, 8(1), 21–30. doi:10.23887/ijll.v8i1.67505
Wahyudi, A. (2023). Struktur kalimat tunggal bahasa Bugis dialek Bulukumba. Jurnal Sarjana Ilmu Budaya, 3(2), 1–13. doi:10.12259/jsib.v3i2.25543
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/kaloka.v5i2.28298
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
JP3 (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Pendidik) telah terindeks pada:
JP3 (Jurnal Pendidikan dan Profesi Pendidik) by LPP Universitas PGRI Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at https://journal.upgris.ac.id/index.php/jp3.


.png)









