Intensity of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Use for Physics Learning in High Schools
Abstract
This study investigates the intensity of Artificial Intelligence utilization in Physics education at a public high school in Manado City, Indonesia. The research aimed to understand the patterns and extent of AI integration, as well as the influencing factors, through a qualitative case study approach. The methodology involved in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis with six Physics teachers, students, and school management selected via purposive sampling. Data were analyzed using Miles and Huberman's model and thematic analysis. Key parameters examined included the forms of AI usage, intensity levels (low, medium, high), frequency, depth of utilization, and both supporting (teacher digital competence, school policy support, student enthusiasm) and hindering factors (lack of formal pedagogical training, infrastructure limitations, cultural resistance). Important findings indicate that AI adoption is predominantly at a medium level, primarily utilizing interactive simulations like PhET Interactive Simulation for abstract concept visualization, which significantly enhances student engagement and comprehension. However, comprehensive AI integration for adaptive, personalized learning remains rare. While school facilities are generally supportive, teachers' digital readiness varies, and AI usage frequency averages one to two times per week, the depth of its application often remains instrumental rather than transformational. In conclusion, AI adoption in Physics learning is still nascent, not yet fully optimizing AI's potential as an adaptive intelligent learning system, largely due to variations in teacher competency, school policies, and infrastructure readiness.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
A. Fatmadiwi, S. Suryani, A. Hartoyo, and E. Erlina, “Artificial Intelligence (AI) Policy in Higher Education Learning,” Alwatzikhoebillah Journal of Islamic, Education, Economic, and Humanities Studies, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 284, 2025, doi: 10.37567/alwatzikhoebillah.v11i1.3633.
H. Harianti, A. Kadarohman, and S. Anwar, “The Intersection of AI and Science Education in Indonesia: A Path Forward,” Journal of Science Education Research, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025, doi: 10.21831/jser.v9i1.74872.
N. M. Hutapea and M. Kabatiah, “The Effect of Using ChatGPT on Critical Thinking Skills of Students in the Civic Education Department, Class of 2023, Faculty of Social Science, State University of Medan,” Social Journal of Innovation in Social Studies Education, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 1062, 2025, doi: 10.51878/social.v5i3.6709.
I. F. Kamsin, “Teachers’ Acceptance and Intention to Use Artificial Intelligence Technology in Teaching and Learning Based on the UTAUT Model,” International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 7, p. 1428, 2025, doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2025.15.7.2344.
M. Li, “Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Primary Mathematics Education: Investigating Internal and External Influences on Teacher Adoption,” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2024, doi: 10.1007/s10763-024-10515-w.
M. A. P. Luon, T. B. I. Sogen, D. R. Kabu, W. B. N. Dosinaeng, Y. O. Jagom, and Y. D. Nai, “Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions of Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Developing Learning Materials,” Science Journal of Innovation in Mathematics and Science Education, vol. 5, no. 3, p. 1447, 2025, doi: 10.51878/science.v5i3.6080.
P. S. Maola, I. S. K. Handak, and Y. T. Herlambang, “The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Education in the Era of the Industrial Revolution 4.0,” Educatio, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 61, 2024, doi: 10.29408/edc.v19i1.24772.
J. A. Maxwell, Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific, 2013.
M. A. Muchminiin, M. K. A. Rahmadhani, S. Muqorobin, F. Mustaghfirullah, and O. S. Luthfi, “The Effect of Using Artificial Intelligence (AI) on Learning Interest of Informatics Engineering Students, Class of 2022,” Deleted Journal, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 56, 2024, doi: 10.61132/mars.v2i4.235.
F. Mulianingsih, K. Anwar, F. A. Shintasiwi, and A. J. Rahma, “Artificial Intelligence and the Formation of Values and Character in Education,” Ijtimaiya Journal of Social Science Teaching, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 148, 2020, doi: 10.21043/ji.v4i2.8625.
M. R. Pahleviannur et al., Qualitative Research Methodology. Pradina Pustaka Publishing, 2022, doi: 10.31237/osf.io/jhxuw.
A. Parasuraman, “Technology Readiness Index (TRI),” Journal of Service Research, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 307, 2000, doi: 10.1177/109467050024001.
I. Rusman, Nurmala, Nurasti, Rahmadania, W. Wahyuni, and L. Qadrianti, “The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Learning in the Digital Era,” in Proceedings of the National Seminar of the Faculty of Education and Teacher Training, IAIM Sinjai, 2024, p. 42, doi: 10.47435/sentikjar.v3i0.3138.
A. N. Sihananto, P. W. Atmaja, and S. Sugiarto, “The Use of AI in Programming Learning for University Students,” in Proceedings of the National Seminar on Engineering and Technology (SNARS-TEK), 2024, p. 8, doi: 10.47970/snarstek.v2i1.706.
S. R. Wicaksono, “Basic Theory of the Technology Acceptance Model,” 2022, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7754254.
F. M. Yehya, A. ElSayary, G. A. Murshidi, and A. A. Zaabi, “Artificial Intelligence Integration and Teachers’ Self-Efficacy in Physics Classrooms,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 8, 2025, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/16660.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Lontar Physics Today

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright of Lontar Physics Today ISSN 2828-0970 (online)
Gedung Utama GU.2.01 FPMIPATI, Universitas PGRI Semarang
Jl. Lontar No. 1-Dr. Cipto, Kampus 1 UPGRIS, Semarang
Email: [email protected]

