Transformasi Praktik Penilaian Bahasa Inggris melalui Pendekatan Deep Learning dan Penilaian Otentik di SMA Kabupaten Kendal

Wiyaka Wiyaka; Nur Cholifah; Entika Fani Prastikawati

doi:10.26877/e-dimas.v17i2.26931

Transformasi Praktik Penilaian Bahasa Inggris melalui Pendekatan Deep Learning dan Penilaian Otentik di SMA Kabupaten Kendal

Wiyaka Wiyaka, Nur Cholifah, Entika Fani Prastikawati

Abstract

Program pengabdian kepada masyarakat ini bertujuan untuk memperkuat kompetensi guru Bahasa Inggris SMA di Kabupaten Kendal dalam mengimplementasikan penilaian otentik yang selaras dengan prinsip pembelajaran deep learning. Program ini dilatarbelakangi oleh keterbatasan guru dalam merancang dan menerapkan instrumen penilaian otentik yang mampu mendukung keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan pembelajaran bermakna dalam kerangka Kurikulum Merdeka. Metode pelaksanaan meliputi analisis kebutuhan, workshop peningkatan kapasitas, pengembangan instrumen secara kolaboratif, pendampingan implementasi di kelas, serta pembentukan community of practice. Data diperoleh melalui pre-test dan post-test, observasi kelas, analisis instrumen, dan survei kepuasan peserta. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan adanya peningkatan literasi asesmen guru, khususnya dalam memahami prinsip penilaian otentik, merancang tugas berbasis kinerja, dan menyusun rubrik analitik maupun holistik. Guru mampu mengembangkan tugas autentik seperti proyek, penilaian performa berbicara, dan portofolio reflektif yang selaras dengan tujuan pembelajaran. Implementasi di kelas memperlihatkan keselarasan yang lebih kuat antara tujuan, aktivitas pembelajaran, dan strategi penilaian. Integrasi teknologi digital turut memperkuat dokumentasi dan pemberian umpan balik. Pembentukan komunitas praktik mendukung keberlanjutan transformasi asesmen dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris berbasis deep learning.

Keywords

penilaian otentik; deep learning; pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris; pengembangan profesional guru; pengabdian kepada masyarakat

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, S., & Parmjit, S. (2022). Authentic assessment practices in English language classrooms: Challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Instruction, 15(1), 45–60.

Andrade, H., & Heritage, M. (2018). Using formative assessment to enhance learning, achievement, and academic self-regulation. Routledge.

Asri, Y., & Putra, A. (2021). Implementing authentic assessment in EFL classrooms: Teachers’ perceptions and practices. TESOL International Journal, 16(3), 112–128.

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. ASCD.

Brown, H. D., & Abeywickrama, P. (2019). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (3rd ed.). Pearson.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2014). Beyond the bubble test: How performance assessments support 21st century learning. Wiley.

Dewi, R., & Suhardi, D. (2020). Authentic assessment in the era of the 2013 curriculum: Teachers’ readiness and implementation. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 512–520.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

Gulikers, J., Bastiaens, T., & Kirschner, P. (2018). Defining authentic assessment: Five dimensions revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(5), 779–795.

Herrington, J., Reeves, T., & Oliver, R. (2014). Authentic learning environments. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 401–412). Springer.

Husnawati, A., & Ariyanti, A. (2023). English teachers’ challenges in applying authentic assessment in Indonesian high schools. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 10(1), 1–15.

Lam, R. (2018). Feedback as dialogue: Exploring learner agency in speaking assessment. Language Testing, 35(4), 419–442.

Liu, O. L., Frankel, L., & Roohr, K. C. (2014). Assessing critical thinking in higher education:Current state and directions for next-generation assessment. ETS Research Report Series, 2014(1), 1–23.

McMillan, J. H. (2018). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective standardsbased instruction (7th ed.). Pearson.

O’Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. Addison-Wesley.

Peterson, E., & Irving, S. (2021). Fostering deep learning through performance-based assessment: Lessons from New Zealand. Assessment in Education, 28(3), 334–349.

Popham, W. J. (2017). Classroom assessment: What teachers need to know (8th ed.). Pearson.

Rahmawati, S., & Lestari, I. (2022). The integration of digital tools in authentic assessment practices in Indonesian EFL classrooms. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations, 4(2), 67–81.

Reeve, J. (2016). Students’ agency in learning: A foundation for deep learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 45, 91–98.

Shute, V., & Kim, Y. (2014). Formative and stealth assessment. In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 311–321). Springer.

Stiggins, R. (2017). Revolutionize assessment: Empower students, inspire learning. Corwin.

Widiati, U., & Hayati, N. (2020). Teacher professional development in implementing authentic assessment in Indonesian EFL classes. Indonesia TESOL Journal, 12(1), 45–62.

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post-COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas.v17i2.26931