STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION ON THE USE OF CHATBOT FROM MEMRISE SITE AND THEIR WILLINGNESS TO COMMUNICATE IN ENGLISH

Diah Fitriana Dewi, Siti Nur'Aini, T. Sri Suwarti

Abstract


This final project studies “students’ perception on the use of chatbot and their willingness to communicate in english”. The aims of this study are: (1) To gain insight into students' experience and opinions on the use of chatbot from the memrise site for their language learning (2) To describe how the way students perceive about the use of chatbot from memrise concerning their willingness to communicate in English. A qualitative approach was used in this study. The research design was qualitative, using a semi-structured interview as the research instrument. The population of this research was the students of SMAN 14 Semarang. The writer took only 1 class which was 36 students at class X8 as the sample. The findings of this research suggest that incorporating chatbots, particularly from platforms like memrise, can be beneficial for students aiming to enhance their language skills and willingness to communicate in English. The interactive and personalized nature of chatbots provides a unique learning experience. The result shows that students generally found the chatbot to be a valuable tool in their language-learning journey. Through interviews, it was evident that using a chatbot in memrise encouraged students to communicate in English, providing a practical and interactive approach. Moreover, the study revealed that the chatbot positively influenced students' willingness to communicate in English. The personalized learning experiences offered by the chatbot, adapting to individual skill levels, made language learning more interesting and motivational.

 


Keywords


students’ perception, chatbot, memrise, willingness to communicate, english learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abarghoui, M. A., & Taki, S. (2018). Measuring the effectiveness of using “memrise” on high school students’ perceptions of learning efl. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(12), 1758. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0812.25

Auslander, P. (2002). Live from cyberspace: or, i was sitting at my computer this guy appeared he thought i was a bot. PAJ: A Journal of Performance and Art, 24(1), 16–21.

Ayedoun, E., Hayashi, Y., & Seta, K. (2015). A conversational agent to encourage willingness to communicate in the context of english as a foreign language. Procedia Computer Science, 60(1), 1433–1442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.08.219

Çakmak, F. (2022). Chatbot-human interaction and its effects on efl students’ l2 speaking performance and anxiety. Novitas-ROYAL, 16(2), 113–131.

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. Http://Lst-Iiep.Iiep-Unesco.Org/Cgi-Bin/Wwwi32.Exe/[In=epidoc1.in]/?T2000=011160/(100).

Darlington, Y., & Scott, D. (2020). Qualitative research in practice: stories from the field. Taylor & Francis.

Dutta, S. (2020). The importance of “english” language in today’s world. International Journal of English Learning & Teaching Skills, 2(1), 1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.15864/ijelts.2119

Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402454.2006.10784561

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Artifical intelligence (ai) techology in openai chatgpt application: a review of chatgpt in writing english essay. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), 44–28.

Husna, L. (2009). Students’ unwillingness to speak in efl classroom from cultural perspective Lailatul. 1–12.

Kim, N.-Y. (2019). A study on the use of artificial intelligence chatbots for improving english grammar skills. Journal of Digital Convergence, 17(8), 37–46.

Kohnke, L. (2023). L2 learners’ perceptions of a chatbot as a potential independent language learning tool. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 17(1–2), 214–226.

Kothari, C. R. (2004). Research methodology: methods and techniques. New Age International (P) Limited.

MacIntyre, P. D., & Doucette, J. (2010). Willingness to communicate and action control. System, 38(2), 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.12.013

Pataranutaporn, P., Danry, V., Leong, J., Punpongsanon, P., Novy, D.,

Maes, P., & Sra, M. (2021). AI-generated characters for supporting personalized learning and well-being. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(12), 1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00417-9

Rihardini, A. A., Yaniafari, R. P., & Mukminatien, N. (2021). Students’ willingness to communicate using english: a survey study. Paramasastra, 8(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.26740/parama.v8n1.p60-74

Sheybani, M. (2019). The relationship between efl learners’ willingness to communicate (wtc) and their teacher immediacy attributes: a structural equation modelling. Cogent Psychology, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2019.1607051

Slameto. (1988). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. Bina Aksara.

Solso, R., MacLin, M., & Maclin, O. (2007). Cognitive psychology 7th international edition.

Valadi, A., Rezaee, A., & Baharvand, P. (2015). The relationship between language learners’ willingness to communicate and their oral language proficiency with regard to gender differences. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4, 147–153. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.147




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/lej.v2i1.18092

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Diah Fitriana Dewi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Linguistics and Education Journal by Magister Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Universitas Persatuan Guru Republik Indonesia Semarang is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.