THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BANKING LEGAL PROTECTION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE CASE OF CUSTOMER FUND EMBEZZLEMENT STUDY OF DECISION NO107/PIDB/2022/PNPIN

Cut Tsania Fakhira; Aloysia Indrahayati; Meita Fadhilah; Tri Setiady

doi:10.26877/m-y.v9i1.27196

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN BANKING LEGAL PROTECTION AND CRIMINAL LIABILITY IN THE CASE OF CUSTOMER FUND EMBEZZLEMENT STUDY OF DECISION NO107/PIDB/2022/PNPIN

Cut Tsania Fakhira, Aloysia Indrahayati, Meita Fadhilah, Tri Setiady

Abstract

Banking institutions function as financial intermediaries that channel funds from surplus units to deficit units, and their existence is highly dependent on the principle of trust.One of the most serious challenges faced by banks is the embezzlementofcustomerfundsby internal actors, sometimes using forged documents. This issue is exemplified in Decision No. 107/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pin, which highlights weaknesses in internal banking supervision, causing significant customer losses and undermining the stability of the national financial system. Normatively, embezzlement is regulated under Articles 372 and 374 of the Indonesian Penal Code (KUHP) and specifically addressed in Article 49 paragraph (1) of Law No. 10 of1998on Banking, which imposes criminal sanctions on bank officials or employees who abuse their authority.

Keywords

literacy; local wisdom; natural and social science; wordwall

Full Text:

PDF

References

Almaliki, O. J. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of internal control systems in Iraqi commercial banks. World Economics and Finance Bulletin, 20, 114–122.

Ardha, D. J. (2020). Analisis kasus pemalsuan kartu kredit sebagai bentuk tindak pidana perbankan. Doctrinal, 5(2), 245–

Awdina, H., Suryani, L., & Putra,

M. A. A. (2024). Penegakan hukum dan keadilan restoratif dalam kasus penggelapan dana nasabah: Telaah putusan No. 107/Pid.B/2022/PN.Pin. Jurnal Litigasi Amsir, 29–35.

Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum jaminan dan jaminan kredit perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Datau, R. (2017). Penggelapan dana simpanan nasabah sebagai kejahatan perbankan. Lex Privatum, 5(1).

Engka, F. F. (2023). Delik penggelapan berat (Pasal 374 KUHP) dan pemakaian barang oleh pemegang.

Fajriah, Y., Jumady, E., & Halim,

A. (2022). Good corporate governance and corporate social responsibility on company value with financial performance. Jurnal Akuntansi, 26(2), 324–

Ghozali, M., et al. (2024). Kejahatan siber (cyber crime) dan implikasi hukumnya: Studi kasus peretasan Bank Syariah Indonesia (BSI). Cendekia: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial dan Humaniora, 2(4), 797–809.

Huda, N., & Puspitasari, N. (2018). Perlindungan hukum bagi nasabah bank dalam kasus penggelapan dana. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 25(1).

Purba, D. A. M., Pandiangan, H. J., & Sitanggang, D. (2024). Analisis yuridis pengurangan pemidanaan bagi terdakwa perempuan pada kasus korupsi di setiap tingkatan pengadilan. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika, 1345– 1369.

Ratmono, D., & Frendy. (2022). Examining the fraud diamond theory through ethical culture variables: A study of regional development banks in Indonesia. Cogent Business & Management, 9(1), 1–18.

Sugiharti, L. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban pegawai bank atas tindak pidana pemalsuan dokumen dalam pemberian kredit. Media Bina Ilmiah, 17(9), 2109–2118.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26877/m-y.v9i1.27196